My latest SORT (Series of Random Thoughts):
-It has been fascinating to listen to the back-and-forth debate over Bill Belichick's fourth-and-2 decision against Indy.
This is where I would defer to the theory espoused by Malcolm Gladwell in ``Blink." Your gut reaction is often the right reaction.
When I saw Belichick going for it on fourth-and-2 from his own 28, my gut reaction went something like: ``Are you kidding me?"
Given time to intellectualize the decision, some analysts have defended Belichick, saying that this kind of innovative, non-traditional risk-taking is what has made him the greatest coach of his generation.
Here's what my gut told me, and what I still believe: One factor that coaches and managers must consider that the average stat geek ignores is what effect a decision will have on the psychology of his players and team. Often I disagree with Twins manager Ron Gardenhire on statistical and strategic grounds, and yet agree with his decision because he has to live with and guide his players over 162 games. Egos matter. Atmosphere matters. Relationships matter, in sports and in every other business.
I not only believe that statistically the Patriots had a better chance of winning by punting, I believe that Belichick told his defensive players that he didn't trust them with that decision.
Talk to football players enough, and you realize that trust _ trusting your coaches, trusting your teammates, having faith that you are putting your limbs and joints at risk for a worthy cause _ is inherent in the culture of winning teams. I'm not sure Belichick and his defensive players will have the same relationship now.