Politics.
For several years, via social media and in the pages of this newspaper, I have been advocating a wrecking-ball approach to Peavey Plaza in downtown Minneapolis. I even volunteered to take the first swing.
Civic movers and shakers were on the same wavelength, and offered up a $10 million remake by Minneapolis landscape architect Thomas Oslund. The proposal (I liked it) triggered a lawsuit from Preservation Alliance of Minnesota and Washington, D.C.-based Cultural Landscape Foundation.
The preservationists prevailed, meaning 39-year-old Peavey Plaza won't become the next episode in the long-running miniseries that is Teardownapolis.
The wisdom of this October 2013 agreement was lost on me. Save Peavey? Why? Reversing the example set by our democracy's poisonous climate, I decided to stop talking and listen, enlisting my own personal preservationist shaman: Jean Garbarini, a Minneapolis landscape architect and longtime Peavey enthusiast.
Over a recent brown-bag lunch — first at a rickety table overlooking the plaza's waterless pool, then on a walking tour — Garbarini adjusted my vision and showed me how I could — correction, would — learn to love Peavey once again.
"It's beautiful," she said. "Well, it's not beautiful right now, but it could be beautiful again. It's an iconic space that says 'Minneapolis.' You'll never find another space like this anywhere else."
Garbarini and I instantly agreed on one thing: Peavey, a career high point for landscape architect M. Paul Friedberg, is a sorry shadow of its original, enthralling self.