Campaign Finance decision from U.S. Supreme Court likely has Minnesota impact

Read the decision

January 21, 2010 at 4:10PM

The U.S. Supreme Court today struck down a decades' long ban on corporate and union spending to support candidates. The 5-4 vote, "overturned a 20-year-old ruling that said corporations can be prohibited from using money from their general treasuries to pay for their own campaign ads," says the Washington Post.

The decision may have a major impact in Minnesota -- not just in federal campaigns waged here but in state campaigns, since Minnesota is among two dozen states that ban, with some exceptions, such spending by corperations and unions on so-called advocacy ads. We're still sorting through the implications for the state but meanwhile, take a gander at the lengthy opinion from the court here.

about the writer

about the writer

rachelsb

More from No Section

See More
FILE -- A rent deposit slot at an apartment complex in Tucker, Ga., on July 21, 2020. As an eviction crisis has seemed increasingly likely this summer, everyone in the housing market has made the same plea to Washington: Send money — lots of it — that would keep renters in their homes and landlords afloat. (Melissa Golden/The New York Times) ORG XMIT: XNYT58
Melissa Golden/The New York Times

It’s too soon to tell how much the immigration crackdown is to blame.