CHICAGO -- Jim Delany has the votes to implement a nine-game conference schedule in football, without a doubt. The Big Ten commissioner is too smart to suggest it's going to happen without being certain that the league's athletic directors and presidents will go along with the idea.
Good thing he's not polling the coaches, though.
Ohio State coach Jim Tressel criticized the idea on Monday, asserting that some of the Buckeyes' non-revenue sports may be in trouble if the football team can't schedule eight home games, as it has this year.
And on Tuesday, Illinois coach Ron Zook was equally forceful in pointing out some potential drawbacks that are especially important to him.
"It's going to cost (the conference) bowl berths. It's going to knock teams out of the postseason," Zook said. "And it could cost somebody their job."
That's because an expanded Big Ten schedule will leave only three slots for non-conference games, which most teams use to schedule all-but-certain victories. And with half the conference playing five road games every season, the potential grows for a 6-6 bowl-eligible season to turn into a 5-7 stay-at-home instead.
"This is why they don't let coaches have a say in this. I understand the desire to keep more of our revenues inside the conference, and the fans' preference for conference games instead of lesser opponents. But you're adding six more losses to our records -- that hurts the league," Zook said. "I don't know of many coaches who will be in favor of this."
Gee, I didn't have to look far to find one. About 30 feet away from Zook, Minnesota coach Tim Brewster had three words for the nine-game plan: Bring it on.