Bonnie Blodgett: Big Oil with the answer? Don't bet on it.

Exxon Mobil embraces climate responsibility as only it could.

By Bonnie Blodgett

July 7, 2012 at 9:45PM
Exxon, which is based in Irving, Texas, set a record in 2008 for the highest quarterly earnings by any company.
Exxon, which is based in Irving, Texas, set a record in 2008 for the highest quarterly earnings by any company. (Associated Press/The Minnesota Star Tribune)

The 1970s are remembered as the dismal decade. Times were tough, all right. The average teenager didn't have a credit card, and a lot of families made do with one car. On the other hand, college was affordable, and people of every age and political stripe celebrated Earth Day on the assumption that fossil fuels were on their way out. We would adapt. It would be tough but not impossible. And besides, wouldn't everyone trade plentiful gas for clean air and a safer world?

Not everyone, it turns out. Americans drank the supply-side Kool-Aid that said we could have it both ways. The pendulum swing from a conservative attitude toward environmental protection to a vastly more liberal one bought the energy and agribusiness cartels the time they needed to mess up the environment permanently. It took just four decades.

Exxon Mobil, the same company that has spent millions debunking global warming, is now denying its own denial. CEO Rex Tillerson calmly informed the Council on Foreign Relations in New York on Wednesday that climate change is real. Always has been. Anyone noticed the crazy weather we've been having?

It is not, however, the real peril, he added. Nor is the real threat the normal knee-jerk Republican whipping boys such as government restrictions on deep-water drilling, or a carbon tax to depress sales of petroleum products, or an end to the subsidies for corn and soybean producers and Big Oil. Tillerson explained that because oil is priced globally, even drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge won't lower prices at U.S. pumps -- especially not when you have speculators (whose existence he also admitted for the first time), supervised by the likes of Goldman Sachs, taking a 30 to 40 percent cut from every barrel sold.

Climate change apparently isn't dangerous at all. What's truly reckless and job-killing, Tillerson warned through his wire-rimmed bifocals, is "bad science."

He was referring, I think, to the science that he is also now denying he ever denied. Good science sees climate change as "an engineering problem [that] has an engineering solution." This solution Tillerson describes as a series of "adaptations." What exactly are those? According to an engineer who admits to being skeptical about this strategy and who has a relative employed at one of Exxon Mobil's U.S. plants, the energy giant is conducting "back-room experiments" with biodiesel and algae farming and possibly even geo-engineering as part of its "long-range business plan."

In other words, we're working on the problem, and we'll let you know when our innovative line of green products is available at your local Exxon Mobil station. Until then, consider yourself clueless and impotent -- oh, and also a pain in the ass if you express the slightest concern about that tree that fell on your house or the ozone in the air you are not supposed to breathe in too deeply lest your lungs suffer respiratory sunburn.

"So I guess you're betting that the geeks will pull a rabbit out of their collective test tubes," I said to a guy I ran into at a holiday party who works in the food industry. We'd been chatting about the Tillerson turnaround on climate.

"If government gets out of the way and lets the innovators innovate, we'll come up with something. We always do."

Actually, we usually don't, Noah and his ark notwithstanding. Human history is rife with tragic episodes illustrating our species' tendency to deny reality and go for the quick fix. "The Three Little Pigs" is a cautionary tale about this tendency. Everyone knows which pig got it right by building his house out of bricks instead of sticks or straw.

"Look, Exxon is fueling the world. My employer is feeding it."

Both industries are also growing markets, which is why they insist the planet could easily handle twice its current population. This business model ignores the inconvenient truth that more mouths to feed means more human suffering caused by climate-related floods and famine, pesticides, contaminated water, wars over scarce resources, and crimes of desperation. This is the bargain inherent in the house-of-straw ideology promulgated by those whose own houses (and this is the richest irony of all) are made of sturdy brick and protected by armed guards.

I think solutions will emerge, not through big corporations or big government but through small-scale, community-based initiatives. Here in Minneapolis, the Center for Energy and Environment partners with Xcel Energy and other companies to help lower energy use. Farmers markets and food co-ops are feeding more and more people healthful food. These efforts are catching on. "Think global, act local" used to be just another bumper sticker to me. Now it is religion.

Bonnie Blodgett is a St. Paul writer. She blogs about gardening, politics and life at bonnieblodgett.com.

about the writer

about the writer

Bonnie Blodgett

More from Commentaries

card image

Trump has talked about closing the U.S. Department of Education. Here’s what that could mean for school districts and colleges in the state.