Under questioning by the Minnesota Supreme Court, an attorney for Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp. publicly acknowledged Thursday that the company's "bad conduct" played a role in a judge's decision to impose $4.2 million in penalties against the railroad in a controversial court case arising from a 2003 train accident in Anoka.
But attorney Sam Hanson maintained the railroad's actions do not make it liable for the deaths of four young people, who were killed when their car collided with a BNSF train.
BNSF is appealing a $21.6 million jury award to the victims' families. Last fall, the Minnesota Court of Appeals ruled the case must be retried because jurors were allowed to use the wrong legal standard in holding the railroad responsible for the crash.
However, the appeals panel agreed that Washington County Judge Ellen Maas did not abuse her discretion in handing out $4.2 million in sanctions against the railroad for abusing the legal process. In 2009, Maas found the railroad lost or fabricated evidence, interfered with the families' investigation of the accident and "knowingly advanced lies, misleading facts and/or misrepresentations."
As a packed room listened to the debate in front of Minnesota's highest court, Judge Paul Anderson told Hanson he was "bothered" by the railroad's misconduct.
Said Anderson, "I'm telling you, flat out, I see a big hurdle" to the railroad's appeal.
Hanson's response: "We stand here now with that bad conduct acknowledged."
Much of Thursday's hour-long proceeding revolved around whether BNSF intentionally invited error in the case by not objecting to Maas' allegedly erroneous jury instructions as a way to lay a foundation for a successful appeal. Judges peppered attorneys on both sides with questions on the issue.