It's 10-11-12. At 1:14 it will be 10-11-12/ 13:14. Some people are excited by those things.
OH, NONSENSE Headline of the day, maybe: Russian Christians boosted by Pussy Riot law spank 'sinful' Apple logo. The article says:
I don't believe it. Also, "orthodox" is not radical. But let's go right to the source, and see what Interfax - the most trusted name in news! - has to say. First we'll wash it through Google Translate. Headline: "Orthodox Christians in Russia are beginning to change the "anti-Christian" bitten apple on their device "Apple" on crosses."
From this thin frayed thread, Xbit spun an entire article. An excerpt:
To paraphrase John Gruber, what is it about Apple that makes otherwise intelligent people take leave of their senses when they write about it? From the sound of the story, Radicals are walking into Apple stores and slapping stickers on the logo, when it's entirely possible that the author of the original piece heard about one guy who taped a picture of a cross on his own computer - which seems unlikely, doesn't it? Wouldn't that be rather sacrilegious? And why isn't that word spelled "sacreligious?"
I give the story one day before it's put up on Buzzfeed. (Checking . . . not yet.)
Oh, the idea that there's no official version about the reason for the logo's design? GOOGLE, MOTHERBLEEPER. DO YOU SPEAK IT.