The number of new HIV infections in Minnesota — 300 annually — has remained stubbornly unchanged for the last 15 years, prompting a bipartisan group of legislators to call for the first-ever statewide strategy to tackle the ongoing HIV epidemic and reduce infections to virtually zero.
If approved, the legislation would require the state health department to report to the Legislature next year, explaining how Minnesota can reduce new infections and provide care for the estimated 8,200 people living with HIV or AIDS in the state.
HIV, once considered a death sentence, has become akin to a chronic condition, manageable with regular care and treatment. For those receiving treatment, medical advances have made transmission from person to person next to impossible if viral loads are low enough.
"If you think about how far we've gone with medications, treatment, with the knowledge and tools we have around fighting the HIV epidemic, and preventing the spread of HIV today, it's really surprising that we haven't made a bigger impact," said Matt Toburen, public policy director for the Minnesota AIDS Project.
"We have the knowledge, we have the tools to really make an impact on the epidemic," Toburen said. "We're lacking the leadership or just direction to get us there."
The report would be an important step toward improving services and care for individuals living with HIV, Toburen said. Because HIV affects people across geography and demographics, Minnesota must find strategies to reach all types of individuals, Toburen said. Young gay men in Loring Park, for example, would need to be reached differently from African-born women in Brooklyn Park or an older, married man in Wright County.
Freshman GOP Rep. Keith Franke of St. Paul Park, who is sponsoring the measure in the House, said he was motivated partly because of personal connections to the epidemic. The former mayor said he has a relative living with the virus and a longtime constituent of Franke's motivated the Republican lawmaker to spearhead the issue in the House.
The bill has cleared one House committee and is to be heard by a second panel Wednesday. It's also expected to be heard in the Senate. The legislation seeks no money and instead would use existing state resources to pinpoint what health officials should do to stem the number of new cases.