The Wild enters Sunday with around a 50% chance of making the playoffs according to various probability sites, which leads to this week's question: What is the value of making the postseason as a low seed vs. missing out and being in the draft lottery?
First take: Michael Rand
There is a certain segment of Wild fandom that is annoyed by the team's recent improved play, which has moved Minnesota into the mix for a wild-card spot in the Western Conference. They'd rather have the team bottom out for a better pick.
But here's the deal: Given the Wild's position in the standings, the likelihood of moving up into the top three in the draft via the lottery — if Minnesota misses the playoffs — is slim (around 10%, depending on its exact out-of-the-playoffs finish).
Sportsnet did an interesting valuation of draft picks a few years back. The difference between, say, the Nos. 13 and 17 pick isn't that big.
Also, just getting into the postseason in the NHL brings a real chance for an upset. Just last year, all four wild-card teams won over higher-seeded teams in the first round.
Sarah McLellan: The parity in the NHL in recent years has certainly closed the gap between teams that advance through their division and those that snag wild-card invites.
This format change, which went into effect in 2014, just doesn't have the same feel as the old No. 1 vs. No. 8 matchups where it seemed inevitable the top seed would prevail. Now, who has the upper hand isn't as clear cut. In some cases, it could be argued a wild-card team has the edge because it's been playing playoff hockey for months trying to lock down a spot — whereas the higher seed could be trying to shift out of cruise control.