After a candidates' forum at the end of a long campaign day, four longtime west-metro members of the Minnesota House stood outside the Bloomington City Council chamber earlier this month and compared door-knocking notes.
It's quiet out there, the four DFLers told each other as the forum's moderator (me) eavesdropped. Not angry-quiet, the way it was in 2010, the Tea Party year. Not ominously quiet, as some remembered from the dark closing days of 2002. But so quiet that some voters seem unaware that an election is coming on Nov. 4.
"It's unique — like nothing I've seen before," said Bloomington Rep. Ann Lenczewski, who's running her 11th political race, nine of them in east Bloomington's state House district. Colleagues Jean Wagenius of Minneapolis, Ron Erhardt of Edina and Linda Slocum of Richfield nodded in affirmation.
"I ask [voters], 'Do you have any issues?' " Erhardt said. "It doesn't elicit a lot of response."
Has apathy afflicted Minnesotans this year? These veterans know better than to leap to that conclusion. With 36 House terms among them, they don't doubt that their constituents care deeply about schools, roads, transit, public safety and the rest, and about the price they pay for those services.
Here's another possibility: Minnesota is moving into a new political chapter. Old issues have passed away. New ones have yet to ripen into deeply and widely felt concerns. Candidates and voters have yet to figure out how to talk to each other about what's next — hence the quiet campaign.
This is a tentative notion. But this much is clear: Many of the issues about which Minnesotans have squabbled for the last decade or two have now either been resolved or lost their political punch.
For example: Two of the last three gubernatorial elections (2002 and 2010) were all about how to cope with a giant looming state budget deficit. The third, in 2006, was about how to repair the damage of Deficit No. 1. Campaigns were fought on whether or not to include a tax increase in the remedy, and what spending could be cut.