At a glance: Minnesota constitutional amendment change

March 15, 2014 at 11:28PM

the path to ballot

Issue: Require three-fifths majorities of the Legislature, not simple majorities, and more time to submit proposed state constitutional amendments to voters.

Pro: Changes to the state's founding document should require bipartisan support.

Con: System already allows voters to settle controversial issues.

Recent: Passage by voters of "Legacy" tax hike in 2008 to fund outdoors and arts projects; defeat by voters of same-sex marriage ban and voter ID requirement in 2012.

Wrinkle No. 1: Proposed change would itself require a voter-approved constitutional amendment.

Wrinkle No. 2: Once before voters, Minnesota requires a majority of all voters in election to approve amendment.

National: Majority of states make constitutional amendments harder for legislatures to submit to voters.

about the writer

about the writer

More from No Section

See More
FILE -- A rent deposit slot at an apartment complex in Tucker, Ga., on July 21, 2020. As an eviction crisis has seemed increasingly likely this summer, everyone in the housing market has made the same plea to Washington: Send money — lots of it — that would keep renters in their homes and landlords afloat. (Melissa Golden/The New York Times) ORG XMIT: XNYT58
Melissa Golden/The New York Times

It’s too soon to tell how much the immigration crackdown is to blame.