In mid-February, we used this space to point out that the Twins' 2011 season had the unfortunate potential to mirror the 2010 Vikings season. The conclusion at the time was that even if everything we could possibly conceive of going wrong for the Twins this year actually happened, it couldn't match the utter catastrophe of the Vikings that preceded it.
It is time to report that such a notion no longer is a certainty. It is time to revisit the notion of whether the Twins -- who still are limping to the finish of their nightmare while the Vikings at least get to start fresh Sunday -- have surpassed their purple counterparts.
Expectation vs. reality
2010 Vikings: The squad brought back virtually every core player from a 2009 squad that came oh-so-close to reaching the Super Bowl. On paper at least, the Vikings looked like Super Bowl contenders once again. From that perch, of course, the Vikings fell to a 6-10 finish, a pretty mighty fall.
2011 Twins: A year ago the Twins won 94 games, and despite getting swept (again) in the postseason, their bloated payroll and key holdovers put them on pace again to be at least a division contender.
They buried themselves with a 17-37 start and also could finish last.
Edge: Still goes to the 2010 Vikings. It's close, but we still say the distance between expectations and results still is greater when it comes to the purple.
Historical context