My Mpls (Home) and Garden Show Review; It's Not All Bad

An improvement over last year? Let me know what you think. Better than 2010?

March 5, 2011 at 10:31PM
(The Minnesota Star Tribune)

Last year I wrote about my first visit to the Minneapolis Home and Garden Show. I went with high hopes and expectations, only to find big disappointment compared to other garden shows I've attended; especially with the Wichita Lawn and Garden Show (my old stomping grounds). I know, who knew?

That garden show is a bit of a sleeper and a big surprise to those who go. To think that flat flyover country can produce one of the top ten garden shows in the country never stops astounding gardening and non-gardening fans alike. This year was no different; with the theme "Gardens Out of Movies", those Kansas landscapers pulled out all the stops. And even without the enormous dinosaurs in the Jurassic Park garden, it still would have been no contest.

That said...I know a few things about garden shows.

  • Show gardens are expensive and time consuming
    • Show gardens are supposed to sell landscaping good and services
      • The economy affects the scale of the garden displays.
        • The Minneapolis show is about homes too.
          • People want to see color and flowers.

            However, the advance publicity described the show as improved while showing a tight shot of a waterfall, probably taken from a low vantage point. I bit and decided to give it another shot.

            I'm glad I went. Things were better, a bit. Best of all, my fellow Master Gardeners are there giving solid, science-based presentations on lots of hot topics in gardening. If you go, be sure to stop by and hear them.

            But in reality, the garden show is there to sell hardscape, the part of gardening that brings in the bucks. I understand.

            There's always a place where you can vote on your favorite garden. Since I have my own soapbox, I'll give you my thoughts right here.

            (The Minnesota Star Tribune)

            Most of the gardens showed more ambition this year, this one especially with lots of color and texture with creative outdoor living spaces.

            (The Minnesota Star Tribune)

            Lots of stone work and water features made this one a popular stop.

            (The Minnesota Star Tribune)

            Unfortunately there were still lots of unimaginative and rigid scenes like this one.

            (The Minnesota Star Tribune)

            Too much bare mulch, and stiff stands of tulips. Was it finished?

            (The Minnesota Star Tribune)

            On the plus side, what a striking container planting. A red urn, how unexpected and fun.

            (The Minnesota Star Tribune)

            This lovely garden fell short in the garden art category with these cheesy cherubs.

            (The Minnesota Star Tribune)

            Very nice attention to detail. Whimsy too.

            (The Minnesota Star Tribune)

            Simple but stunning. Good textures.

            (The Minnesota Star Tribune)

            Nice combination of spring bulbs and begonia. The slightly flopping foliage actually charming next to stiff, soldier-like spring flowers in most displays.

            (The Minnesota Star Tribune)

            This delightful vignette shows that big isn't better, and that the grand gardens don't have to be really grand to be successful. This tin roof and trough waterfall stole my heart.

            I hate to use this reviled phrase but the Mpls show "is what it is". I think I should manage my thinking to understand that it has more of state fair feel than other garden shows around the country. And as long as it is driven by the construction and home industry it probably won't change.

            Walking around, the demographics don't show the changing face of "gardening" going in the Twin Cities. This city is hell bent on horticulture but the show doesn't reflect that. More and more young people are taking up their trowels. Yet I didn't see any examples of edible landscaping. That is "the big thing" and will be only getting bigger.

            But seeds and veggie plots don't pay salaries for landscaping companies and I am completely aware of that conundrum.

            Maybe it's all in the name. Perhaps it should be called the Mpls Home and Landscape Show.

            about the writer

            about the writer

            gardenbuzz