Ask exotic-pet owners why they opted for pythons or tarantulas and you get ... well, pretty much the same responses you'd expect from folks with more traditional pets.
Roy and Beverly Carlson were empty-nesters whose five children had grown up, and they were seeking humanlike companionship; enter Michael the pigtail macaque (a "monkid" in pet parlance). Gwen Hovde and Andrew Reddig switched to sugar gliders because they were tired of having hamsters die on them. Kaine Trondson used to be allergic to cats and soon took a liking to reptiles.
Another trait they share with those for whom cats and dogs reign: a disdain for irresponsible pet owners. The problem with exotic pets, they maintain, is not the animals but the people, irresponsible owners and breeders.
"That's the way it is with every species," Hovde said. "Pit bulls are great pets if they're treated right. Same with sugar gliders."
Hovde is glad she lives on the west side of the river. Last December, the St. Paul City Council banned sugar gliders, but they remain legal in Minneapolis and most suburbs.
"That ban was due to ignorance, really," said Trondson, who owns and sells animals at Special-T Pets in North Branch. "They need to go after the [breeding] mills rather than the loving owners of these animals. People go to exotic shows, and [the mills] overcharge for the animals, tell the people to feed 'em cat food or whatever, don't ask any questions or talk about responsible ownership."
Exotic-pet owners aren't the only ones who stress personal responsibility on the pet owner's part. Jamie Turner, who works at the Como Park Animal Hospital and takes in exotic animals for "rescue," has observed the pattern of animals outgrowing their welcome.
"That's what you saw with the Vietnamese potbellied pigs [a 1980s fad]," said Turner. "People got these cute little animals and before long found themselves with 200-pound sows."