On Saturday, 50,000 or more pheasant hunters took to the state's hinterlands looking for a rooster or two to put to wing. Most were unsuccessful.
Which in itself isn't remarkable, because opening day of Minnesota pheasant hunting circa 2018 is in some ways a caricature of its former self.
The opener was once an opportunity for first-generation Twin Cities residents to return home to Slayton, Marshall, Barrett, Madelia and a thousand other small towns in the state's pheasant range, and to join with families there to find ringnecks in woodlots, roadsides and along fence lines that no longer exist. Today it is largely a scramble by die-hard uplanders to pinpoint the state's relatively few birds that aren't hiding in unharvested corn and soybean fields.
Which is OK. In a world that rewards convenience over challenge and comfort above all else, hunting — which fundamentally is an exercise in natural-food gathering — remains the rare pastime that is both physically demanding and intellectually stimulating.
Those who doubt the latter should try someday to outwit wild animals that hone their survival instincts 24 hours a day, seven days a week, year-round. Pheasants are such a species, as are deer, ruffed grouse and waterfowl, ducks particularly.
Yet the topic today is not so much the difficulties hunters did or did not encounter finding pheasants Saturday. The larger issue is the remarkable — and scary — indifference with which the general public greets news of species declines, including the pheasant's, whose population ups and downs bear a direct relationship to farmland health, measured by habitat availability and especially insect abundance.
Readers of this newspaper might recall a story published in late September that carried the headline, "The bugs of summer are vanishing: Critical link in food chain seems in decline globally."
The famed Harvard biologist E.O. Wilson, who once called bugs, "The little things that run the world," was quoted in the story saying: "The flying insects are virtually gone."