A new look at the University of Minnesota's administration spotlights few areas that could be tightened. Whether that will satisfy legislators will be seen next week.
"This is not the silver bullet," U President Eric Kaler told the Board of Regents on Friday. "It calls out areas in the organization that need to be examined, and we will do that."
Legislators will review the consultants' report in higher education committees Monday and Tuesday. It's unclear whether the analysis — of about 600 positions — will assuage concerns about costs, which intensified when the Wall Street Journal used the university as an example of administrative growth.
"The question is: Does this put to bed the Wall Street Journal article?" said Rep. Gene Pelowski, chairman of the Higher Education Finance and Policy Committee.
The university hired New York-based Sibson Consulting to analyze its layers of administration employee by employee.
The first report — covering human resources, finance, information technology and purchasing — shows "few areas that require attention" but says the U "could improve" its staffing per supervisor.
In finance, supervisors have an average of 3.9 people reporting to them, while information technology supervisors had an average of 9.5. Human resources came in at 4.9. Supervisors in purchasing had the lowest average: 3.6.
Information technology's number indicates that the office is "operating for effectiveness," said Kathy Brown, vice president of human resources.