Amid a swirl of allegations, suspensions and a boycott involving the University of Minnesota football program, a simple, three-word phrase summarized the debate dividing the campus over the school's sexual assault policy and punishment process: "We had enough."
Written as a social media hashtag, some team members used the phrase to express exasperation that the university had indefinitely suspended 10 Gophers players even though they hadn't been criminally charged or received a school hearing over an alleged sexual assault of a woman in September.
Yet even without knowing all the facts surrounding the incident, much of which began trickling out in university investigative reports that surfaced late Friday, students and others quickly took sides, either to support the team in its boycott over a scheduled bowl game or to show revulsion over what had allegedly happened that September morning in an off-campus apartment building.
The controversy, set locally in one of the nation's largest universities, arises at a time when schools across the country are grappling with a push to re-examine their response to campus sexual assaults.
Hunching over a phone after a biology final exam Friday, students Johnny Dietz and Anna Boyd pulled up one football player's Twitter account and saw the hashtag, nodding as they scrolled.
"These [players] have dreams of the NFL and going to school but are being held guilty by association," said Dietz, a 21-year-old self-described Gophers football fan. "Now their reputations are completely diminished. It's unfair."
"I still feel for the girl involved," Boyd said. "But if [the players] were cleared by the law, there's no point to the suspensions."
In a nearby study area in Coffman Memorial Union, 22-year-old Elliot Past's take was decidedly different: "I'm sure women have also 'had enough' feeling unsafe on this campus," he said.