DAYTONA BEACH, Fla. — Four-time IndyCar champion Alex Palou on Friday was ordered to pay McLaren Racing more than $12 million in the breach of contract suit the team filed when the Spaniard backed out of two different deals with the racing team.
The Friday ruling from London's High Court came after a five-week trial last year. McLaren initially sought almost $30 million in damages, but that number was reduced to $20.7 million as the racing juggernaut sought to reclaim money allegedly lost in sponsorship, driver salaries and performance earnings.
''I never wanted to end up in court. It's not really how we do things at McLaren Racing and we tried hard to find a solution at the time,'' McLaren Racing boss Zak Brown told The Associated Press at Daytona International Speedway.
"In the end Alex — supported by a large legal team — sadly left us no option, and they now have a very significant legal bill to show for it. I happen to believe that treating others with respect and staying true to your word matters a great deal both in life and in our sport, but as we have seen as this case evolved, that view wasn't shared by all involved.''
McLaren added it is still seeking interest and reimbursement of its legal expenses — a judgement in favor of the team could push Palou's total owed to more than $20 million. It is not clear if Chip Ganassi, the team owner Palou drives for in IndyCar, is covering any of the losses.
Palou was not ordered to pay anything related to Formula 1 losses McLaren said it suffered when Palou decided to remain with Chip Ganassi Racing rather than move to McLaren's IndyCar team in 2024. All the damages awarded to McLaren were tied to losses the IndyCar team suffered by Palou's change of mind.
''The court has dismissed in their entirety McLaren's Formula 1 claims against me which once stood at almost $15 million," Palou said in a statement. "The court's decision shows the claims against me were completely overblown. It's disappointing that so much time and cost was spent fighting these claims, some of which the Court found had no value, simply because I chose not to drive for McLaren after I learned they wouldn't be able to give me an F1 drive.
''I'm disappointed that any damages have been awarded to McLaren. They have not suffered any loss because of what they have gained from the driver who replaced me. I am considering my options with my advisors and have no further comments to make at this stage.''