ROCHESTER - About 100 residents called on the Rochester City Council on Monday night to push back against the federal immigration enforcement surge in Minnesota.
While council members unanimously criticized the federal actions in Rochester to varying degrees, they were split on whether to involve the city in a state lawsuit seeking to end the surge in Minnesota, reflecting the ongoing divide over how to respond. In the end, they voted 4-3 to support the lawsuit.
“Folks are scared,” said Council Member Dan Doering, who supports Rochester’s participation in the suit. “Folks are worried about what the future might hold.”
Community organizers estimate at least 32 undocumented residents have been detained across southeast Minnesota since Operation Metro Surge began in December.
That’s likely a severe undercount, according to Phil Wheeler of Southeastern Minnesota Interfaith Immigrant Legal Defense. The majority of detainments took place in Rochester, he said, but people have also been picked up in Austin, Albert Lea, Winona, Faribault and other cities.
In Rochester, people have reported dozens of incidents involving Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents in recent weeks, some of which involved U.S. citizens or people living here legally. Local leaders say the operation is affecting area businesses. Rochester Public Schools officials have said more than 500 students have reported absences in recent weeks due to ICE activity.
“I’m a little bit bothered that in the state of Minnesota, there’s a bunch of people [who say], ‘That’s Minneapolis, that’s not our concern,’” said Council Member Patrick Keane. “And that’s just not true.”
Keane introduced the motion to file an amicus brief in support of Minnesota’s lawsuit Monday night, arguing that understanding ICE’s tactics in places like Rochester, Austin or St. Peter “changes the narrative.”