Affirmative Action survives Supreme Court test

June 25, 2013 at 12:11AM
Abigail Fisher challenge affirmative action, saying the University of Texas should not classify people on the basis of race.
Abigail Fisher challenge affirmative action, saying the University of Texas should not classify people on the basis of race. (Stan Schmidt — New York Times/The Minnesota Star Tribune)

Perhaps the best that could have been expected from the Roberts court was a compromise on the affirmative action case, Fisher vs. University of Texas, Austin. That seems to be the result in the 7-1 decision, which affirms the Supreme Court's 2003 decision in Grutter vs. Bollinger that explicitly allowed race to be a factor in admissions decisions, as long as it was not the determining factor.

Justice Anthony Kennedy, who wrote the majority opinion in Fisher and opposed the Grutter decision, kept the Texas ruling narrow, sending the case back to the lower courts to determine whether the university properly applied the principles laid out in Grutter. That counts as a victory — for now — for the freedom of colleges and universities to determine what education entails and how to achieve their goals.

For now, the profound educational, social and economic benefits from racial and ethnic diversity ensured by Grutter live for another day — or case.

about the writer

about the writer

New York Times Editorial

More from Commentaries

See More

Opinion | What happens after our shock fades?

card image
Carlos Gonzalez/The Minnesota Star Tribune

This a challenge specifically to white Minnesotans. Operation Metro Surge is just the latest iteration of a familiar pattern. We must sustain our engagement.

card image
card image