NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell attempted to suspend Adrian Peterson without pay for the final six games of the 2014 season. Goodell did this in a letter sent to Peterson on Nov. 18 in which the commissioner stated, "You have shown no meaningful remorse.''
I went slightly nuts at the time in vilifying Goodell for making himself the judge as to whether Peterson's apology before the Houston court was a proper display of remorse for the whipping of a 4-year-old son.
Peterson appealed Goodell's decision and went back on the make-believe Commissioner's Exempt List, where he was getting paid but was not allowed to play. On Dec. 12, arbitrator Harold Henderson upheld Goodell's decision and Peterson missed his final three weekly paychecks of a 2014 season in which he had played only the season opener.
Again, I cried foul, as Henderson basically was a house man for the NFL and offered no objectivity as an arbitrator.
On March 1, Federal judge David Doty overruled Peterson's suspension and ordered it back to Henderson for reconsideration. Doty's decision remains under appeal by the NFL, even as Peterson was reinstated in mid-April.
Someday, if Doty is upheld, Peterson might get back a portion of the $2,073,529.50 in gross pay that he missed with those three late-season paychecks.
I'm guessing the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in St. Louis will not take into evidence the current issue of ESPN the Magazine. If so, the judges involved in the appeal might have to go back to a key phrase in Goodell's original decision and conclude the commissioner was right all along:
Adrian Peterson has shown no meaningful remorse in the whipping of a 4-year-old son.