The American Civil Liberties Union of Minnesota launched a drive to defeat a photo ID requirement for voters by offering a $1,000 reward to anyone who can prove a case of "voter impersonation," which the ACLU says is the only type of fraud an ID requirement would prevent.
"There is no voter impersonation fraud in Minnesota, and we are willing to bet on it," said a statement from Chuck Samuelson, executive director of the ACLU-Minnesota. He stood at a podium at the state Capitol with $1,000 in ACLU money stacked before him and issued the challenge.
His point was serious, and it is this: that the push to require every voter to show a photo ID at the polls would not deter fraud, but it would inconvenience people and possibly keep many eligible voters from casting ballots.
Samuelson said the ACLU prize goes to anyone who produces proof of a legal charge, indictment or conviction for the crime of voter impersonation -- voting in the name of another person -- in Minnesota within the last 10 years. Evidence is to be presented at the ACLU offices, 2300 Myrtle Avenue, Suite 180, St. Paul, MN,., 55114, by 5 p.m. on March 30, 2012. Those seeking further information are encouraged to call Carolyn Jackson, 651-645-4097, ext. 125. Results are to be announced on April 2.
"The bet is that no one has been legally charged, indicted or convicted for voter impersonation in the state of Minnesota between Jan. 1, 2002 and March 30, 2012," Samuelson said.
Samuelson said the photo ID provision "would not prevent the voter fraud that we know exists, and that is felons who are out of jail, but not off parole, who have voted or registered to vote," because those people likely have photo IDs. Said Sen. Jeff Hayden, DFL-Minneapolis, who appeared at the news conference, "This is one of those bills that is a solution looking for a problem."
The Republican-controlled Legislature passed a photo ID bill last year and sent it to Gov. Dayton, who vetoed it. This year, supporters are planning to pass it as a proposed constitutional amendment, which would avoid Dayton's veto pen and allow voters to decide the issue in the November election.
Supporters say it is a simple measure that would improve the security of the polling place, and ensure that people are who they say they are. A series of liberal and religious groups have held events in opposition, saying it is an attempt to throw up barriers to students, elderly voters and minorities, who would me most likelty to not have current-address IDs.