What do pancakes, custard and soup stock have in common?
An egg.
No other food serves so many functions, says Michael Ruhlman in his new book "Egg: A Culinary Exploration of the World's Most Versatile Ingredient" (Little, Brown and Co., 236 pages, $40). The Cleveland-based writer, whose extensive body of work often highlights culinary technique, turns his attention to our most useful cooking tool, the simple egg.
Q: What's so important about the egg?
A: It does so many things in the kitchen. The idea behind the book was to explore the notion that if you knew all there was about the egg, you could increase your skills' capacity as a cook by a factor of 10. No single ingredient has so many applications in the kitchen. We tend to take it for granted because they are ubiquitous. They are inexpensive. But that's the very source of their strength. They are a miracle of nutrition, economy, deliciousness and utility. They are so versatile. The egg white is sort of a powerhouse bundle of protein that can create an angel food cake or marshmallows or clarify a stock or give body to a cocktail. There's just no end to what you can do with a humble egg.
Q: The egg got a bad rap a while back.
A: When I was growing up in the '70s and '80s, they were saying eggs were bad for you. This is an example of our stupidity and gullibility. Here is this miracle of nutrition and utility and economy, and we were warned away from it and told that it was bad when, in fact, it's not bad. Eggs have all the nutrition we need. All the stuff that creates life is contained within the fragile shell. When you're eating an egg, you are eating the very stuff of life itself. I tell people at gatherings that we need to pay attention not to news reports and not to nutritionists. No one really knows anything for certain. I ate a lot of eggs while we were testing these recipes, and there were times when my body said "no more eggs." So I didn't eat them. I wish we would just listen to our bodies and eat natural foods that we cook ourselves.
Q: So which came first, the technique or the recipe?