Opinion editor's note: Star Tribune Opinion publishes a mix of national and local commentaries online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.
•••
Midway through 2020 I inherited a rather extensive collection of classical literature from my grandfather. The collection, "Great Books of the Western World," was a curation of the most essential works produced by Western culture up until the 20th century, as selected, ultimately, by its editor Mortimer J. Adler.
The collection contained everything from sonnets and science to literature and economics, government and history. As far as I was concerned, there could not have been a more perfect time for those books to arrive in my life. With the pandemic and lockdowns limiting my opportunities to socialize, I had ample time to explore this new world I had been given. I like to think that I made the most of the opportunity and consumed as much of the West's epochal wisdom as I could.
Among my many initial impressions, what stood out the most was that this new world, full of old ideas, was surprisingly modern. And the world I was familiar with, here in the 21st century, was still littered with challenges and conversations of the past, dating back to antiquity.
Assuming that classical literature is dated because of its age is foolish. Sure, some of the original ideas as they arose in their infancy are less relevant today, but even those provide valuable lessons. Take for example, the explanations of nature made by the Roman Lucretius (died about 50 B.C.).
We know now that the sky does not rotate about the Earth due to wind currents, as Lucretius thought, but the creative thinking and logical reasoning supporting those observations was brilliant. Rather than submitting to the common convention of his day, that deities guided all natural forces, he reasoned through observation (ahem, the scientific method). And while he was incorrect in his hypothesis regarding the sky, he did reason out a number of other natural phenomena, like the concept of elements and atoms, that are supported by modern science today.
The method of reasoning is often worth as much as the idea it produces, and an idea erring in its infancy is forgivable for lack of a sturdier foundation of knowledge from which to advance. Advance being the key word.