About the only thing clear about the muddy situation between receiver Stefon Diggs and the Vikings is that he's frustrated by his role in the offense. The question today is a simple one: Should Diggs be frustrated?
First take: Michael Rand
It's funny, but I had a sense this was going to happen at some point this season. Diggs was saying all the right things after the Vikings attempted only 10 passes in a Week 1 victory (two of them in his direction), but when I jokingly asked if he'd be OK not catching another pass all year he quipped, "Ah, naw, that ain't going to happen."
Players want to contribute — particularly when a precedent has been set, and particularly if their lack of contributions is coming in losses.
Diggs was targeted with at least 10 passes in eight of his first 10 games last season, Kirk Cousins' first as a starter. Since then, he's had only one game out of nine with double-digit targets — coinciding with a shift to a focus on the run toward the end of last year and this year at the urging of head coach Mike Zimmer.
The pendulum swung too far away from the pass game, and it's understandable Diggs is frustrated.
Chip Scoggins: His frustration is understandable. Skipping work isn't the right away to express it.
It's not unusual for receivers to complain about not getting enough targets because they feel like they can't help the team if they don't have the ball in their hands. This isn't something new. The Vikings have two star receivers and a head coach who has been extremely vocal in his desire to have an offense built around the running game. We could all see frustration coming.