Prophets are killed because they suggest change in the interest of humanity that requires cultural or legislative compromise.
We are tribal beings. That's our anthropological legacy. If we don't belong to something, our identity becomes unmoored and we lose purpose. So we humans guard our identities as if our lives depend on it. Often, we will even deny flaws in our belonging system in order to protect the base of our identity. We will blame the messenger who points out the flaw, because the system must be defended. Hence, we kill the prophets.
For many humans, living in the United States, our national identity is our pre-eminent identity. We are offended when our country is criticized, and we see its critics as enemies. That's why we panic if the flag is "disrespected."
Our Constitution is the codification of that identity, and many see any amendment or change as inherently sacrilegious.
Since 1776, there have been 1.5 million gun-violence-related deaths in the U.S. In the same period, there have been 1.3 million war-related deaths on U.S. territory. On average, 33,000 people are killed every year, and sensible gun laws would make a difference. But those who benefit from the sale of guns understand the power of identity politics and frame their PR messages as a defense of our Constitution, our belongingness and our very purpose.
They say: A basic freedom that defines you is under threat. Your country is under threat to be unrecognizably altered. The freedom that defines your nation will begin an irrevocable deterioration that will spread to every area of life. There are enemies within who will turn the country of your identity into one that looks like your enemies'. Take a stand on the gun issue or your country and you will never be the same.
This all flies in the face of the reality that when our Constitution has proved inadequate in the past, we have amended it.
The facts are that, for decades, our citizens have been harmed by inadequate protections. That we spend billions to save far fewer American lives in other contexts. That we change multiple laws, compromise many other freedoms, to prevent far fewer deaths. That when it comes to the right to life, and the pain of death, there should be no difference between lives lost to external terror and lives lost to internal terror.