As it weighs a possible upgrade to its aging Prairie Island reactors, Xcel Energy Inc. is finding the economics of nuclear power as challenging as the engineering.
Xcel's stalled plan to boost output of its nuclear power plant in Red Wing, Minn., faces cost concerns when state regulators later this month consider a scaled-back version of the utility's original proposal.
In March, the Minneapolis-based utility put the $322 million project on hold, ceased engineering work and advised the state Public Utilities Commission, which had earlier approved the project, that it now offers less benefit to customers. Xcel says it still believes a scaled-back project -- boosting power about 12 percent vs. nearly 15 percent as originally planned -- is a good investment for ratepayers.
But Xcel said the project could be delayed until 2017 or even later, further complicating the economics.
With seven other U.S. reactors expected to seek major power upgrades in the next four years, the issues raised in Minnesota -- whether to invest heavily in older reactors -- could arise elsewhere.
Two groups that have long challenged Xcel over nuclear waste storage and environmental issues have raised concerns about the costs of generating more power at the plant. The twin reactors went on line in 1973-74 and are licensed to operate until the early 2030s.
"This looks like not a very good deal," said Paula Maccabee, a St. Paul attorney who represents a local citizens group called the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant (PINGP) Study Group. "The economic benefit is very speculative, whereas the health and environmental cost are very real."
Similarly, the Prairie Island Indian Community, whose members live close to the power plant and have long expressed concerns about it, contend the need for the upgrade no longer exists because of lagging electrical demand -- an argument the tribe made unsuccessfully four years ago.