Wyoming lawmakers debating how much money to squirrel away in their rainy-day fund are taking a page from Minnesota's playbook.
Legislators there are adopting a statistical model developed by two Minnesota economists that help account for the volatility in different revenue sources from year to year. The model helps policymakers determine just how much they need to set aside to weather economic downturns or other fiscal challenges.
"It's flattering to have somebody pick up work that you did and apply it to policy analysis in another state," said Tom Stinson, former state economist at Minnesota Management & Budget (MMB).
Stinson developed the model with Matt Schoeppner, an MMB economist. The agency is charged with publishing an economic forecast for the state that lawmakers rely on to set Minnesota's budget.
Stinson said work on the model began around 2008. From year to year, the economists had observed drastic changes in how much revenue the state collected from the capital gains tax.
"The amount that people realize from selling stock and things like that — it goes way up one year and next year can go down, or even turn negative," he said. "It's always a challenge with capital gains."
The model has proved adaptable to other states — even if their economies and tax structures are different from Minnesota, said Brenna Erford, a Pew Charitable Trusts manager who studies state budget policy.
Erford testified before Wyoming lawmakers earlier this month and presented options for policymakers to consider as they determine how to grow their budget reserve and determine criteria for when to tap it. The work was based on Stinson and Schoeppner's model, Erford said.