CP: You have visited two places this year -- Paris and Portland, Oregon -- that are renowned, among many other things, for the crazy outstandingness of their coffee. Yet you do not partake. This is, quite simply, wrong.
RN: Spoken like a true addict.
CP: Guilty as charged. In France, they serve up cafe au lait in a bowl, like it's actual sustenance. Which it is. A croissant without coffee? Why bother?
RN: I managed just fine in Paris with tea and a single lump of sugar, thank you very much. Besides, those au laits appeared to me as if they were really an excuse to serve a scandalous amount of cream, flavored with a shot of coffee. Why not just melt some coffee Häagen-Dazs into a mug and call it a day?
CP: Agreed. When the coffee is superior, black is best. That's why it seemed almost criminal, when lined up at a Stumptown Coffee in Portland recently, to see a patron dump five Splenda packets into his cappuccino.
RN: Eeew. I'm surprised someone didn't call the Beverage Police.
CP: Don't get me wrong, I love sweets, just not in my cup. But back to you: Did you at one point renounce coffee, or have you always been a nonpartaker?
RN: I've never developed an attachment, in part because caffeine does scary things to me. A half cup of French roast transforms me into Ray Milland, shaking off the DTs all the way to an Oscar in "The Lost Weekend."