You've seen this scene play out thousands of times: While the play clock is winding down, the quarterback reads the defense and adjusts the play, protection and routes at the line of scrimmage, sometimes until the final milliseconds before the officials call him for delay of game. A blitz comes, and the quarterback, if he is worth his salt, will get the ball to a receiver before a pass rusher is all over him.
"The quarterback is not going to hold the ball," Vikings defensive line coach Andre Patterson said.
That's the football you're accustomed to, but it's a scenario happening less often in recent years.
In the unceasing cat-and-mouse game between offenses and defenses, teams are blitzing less. On top of that, teams are having more success with only sending four pass rushers.
The NFL has morphed into a passing league — and defenses have figured out the best way to combat that is with fewer blitzes. While it would appear that strategy defies logic applied for decades, there's proof that it's working.
Get this: NFL teams had a total of 641 sacks in 2015 when sending only four rushers an average of 25.1 times per game. The number of sacks jumped to 736 in 2017 with teams sending four rushers an average of 24.5 times per game, according to the sports data firm Sportradar.
At a recent Vikings practice, coaches and players offered some theories as to why teams are better at sacking the quarterback utilizing only four pass rushers.
To Patterson, the reason is simple — teams are opting to drop players in coverage more often in an effort to make quarterbacks go through their progressions. That forces them to hold on to the ball longer and results in more sacks for the four pass rushers.