A friend posed this question about Brett Favre: Was he worth it?
Was he worth the money? The headaches? Was it the right decision to bring him in for two years, one of which was brilliant but ended in frustration, and the other which never veered from frustration?
Because he just finished the most pathetic season of his career and brought the Vikings crashing to earth, and because he did so while endlessly praising himself and focusing on his career achievements _ because he might be the most self-centered human in an industry filled with self-centered humans _ it's easy to say that the Vikings should have passed on him before the 2009 season and saved themselves a lot of trouble.
Even though Favre drove me nuts, I have to say that it was worth it, that the Vikings were absolutely right to give this a shot.
Favre almost reached a Super Bowl the Vikings well could have won. He gave us one of the most dramatic and compelling seasons in franchise history. He gave us lots to talk about. And he became a fascinating psychological study, in good times and bad.
I'd do it all again. Sport is entertainment, and the guy frequently entertained.
He's fascinating. Just not always in a good way.
------------------------