Some members of the University of Minnesota governing board are challenging President Eric Kaler to lower tuition for Minnesotans, but others are questioning a key piece of his plan for controlling in-state tuition: a proposal to hike nonresident tuition significantly.
On Friday, U regents reviewed a five-year undergraduate enrollment and tuition plan for the Twin Cities campus, which includes the nonresident tuition proposal Kaler first unveiled in December. The plan includes goals such as modestly increasing enrollment and graduation rates, which the board mostly welcomed.
When it comes to tuition, though, the regents appeared to split into two camps: those who balked at the proposed nonresident increase and those who scoffed at a goal of keeping resident tuition increases to a minimum. Some said that goal is not ambitious enough, pointing to the higher state financial support the U receives in comparison with other Big Ten schools.
"We are far better supported than many of our peers," said Regent Darrin Rosha. "And yet our benchmark is to be in the middle of the pack."
After the meeting, Kaler suggested tuition for Minnesota students at the U is priced right. And when it comes to dodging a nonresident tuition increase and decreasing what Minnesotans pay, he said, "It would be a significant challenge to have it both ways."
The regents will vote on the enrollment and tuition plan in March. The U's other campuses also will come up with their own five-year plans.
Earlier this week, the board's chairman and vice chairman conducted a formal midyear "check-in" on Kaler's performance. That meeting was closed, but Chairman Dean Johnson reported Friday that he encouraged Kaler to focus more on board priorities, particularly an effort to rethink the partnership between the U's medical operation and Fairview Health.
Kaler, who has previously received stellar reviews from the board, has had a tough year that included the departure of his athletic director amid harassment allegations.