WASHINGTON – From wildly different political vantages, U.S. Reps. John Kline and Keith Ellison and Sen. Al Franken have spent the better part of July urging colleagues to peel back the 14-year-old No Child Left Behind law and replace it with fewer tests and fewer federal requirements.
The work is more than a decade in the making, and each Minnesota member has a different desire in the outcome.
And because it's education politics, there are odd bedfellows.
Democrats, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and civil rights leaders are urging states to retain testing requirements and some level of federal accountability. On the other side, Tea Party groups, liberal and mostly urban parents, and many Republicans are pushing for more local control and the easing of testing in schools.
The debates on Capitol Hill have been emotional.
The Republican-controlled House already has passed a measure that strips out many of the original tenets of former President George W. Bush's signature No Child Left Behind, including giving states a lot more power to decide how to handle failing schools.
The House proposal, authored by Kline, who chairs the House Education and Workforce Committee, eliminates some annual reporting requirements and blocks the Common Core, a national set of education standards that has become anathema for Republican policymakers.
For Kline, getting a bill to President Obama's desk would be a career achievement. He believes No Child's current form is unworkable for schools and wants to block the Obama administration from giving more waivers to states to do whatever they want.