U.S. Rep. Paulsen says current Syria resolution too broad
September 5, 2013 — 10:58pm
Republican U.S. Rep. Erik Paulsen said on Thursday that he would vote ‘no’ on President Obama’s current request for approval of the use of force in Syria but would continue to study various proposals as they come forward.
Asked if he could see himself supporting a more limited resolution than what is currently on the table, Paulsen said: “I’ll look at every resolution that comes in front of me because this is something that you take very seriously in terms of putting troops in harm’s way. So I’ll look at everything.”
“I remain still a skeptic of the existing resolution. There may be dueling resolutions and different support to do different things and we will have to kind of see how that falls out, but I’m a skeptic (of) the president’s request right now. It’s, again, very open-ended, very broad. It’s a very risky proposition. I’ve got concerns about getting involved in a Syrian civil war,” he said Thursday afternoon when asked reporters asked him about his stance. “I’m a 'no' on the existing request."
Although House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, and Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Virginia, have both supported the use of force in Syria, Paulsen said he has gotten no pressure from his party over his views on the issue.
He said he believes the proper response to the accusation that Syrian government used of nerve gas on its own people would be to rally the international community and make sure that there are war crimes that are charged. He said he would probably introduce a war crime resolution “to encourage that direction.”
Gov. Mark Dayton, speaking to a mostly Republican audience at the annual Minnesota Business Partnership dinner, repeated his familiar attack on the House GOP, blaming them for a legislative impasse on transportation.
In a relentlessly antagonistic debate, Clinton denounced Trump Monday night for keeping his business dealings secret and peddling a "racist lie" about Obama. Trump cast Clinton as a "typical politician" as he sought to capitalize on Americans' frustration with Washington.
Senators raised but then postponed an effort Thursday to advance a new legal justification for U.S. military operations against the Islamic State, highlighting the difficulty of carrying out what lawmakers say is their constitutional duty to declare war.