Trump wants 'no absolute tax cut' for upper class, Mnuchin says

Treasury nominee says any tax cuts for the rich "will be offset by less deductions."

Bloomberg News
November 30, 2016 at 10:31PM
Steven Mnuchin, President-elect Donald Trump's nominee for Treasury Secretary, talks with reporters in the lobby of Trump Tower, Wednesday, Nov. 30, 2016, in New York. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)
Steven Mnuchin, President-elect Donald Trump’s nominee for Treasury Secretary, talks with reporters in the lobby of Trump Tower, Wednesday, Nov. 30, 2016, in New York. (The Minnesota Star Tribune)

WASHINGTON – Donald Trump's nominee for Treasury secretary said Wednesday that the president-elect's tax plan won't ultimately cut taxes for "the upper class," which would be a major shift from the tax plan he proposed during the campaign.

"Any reductions we have in upper-income taxes will be offset by less deductions so that there will be no absolute tax cut for the upper class," Steven Mnuchin, who served as the Trump campaign's finance chairman, told CNBC.

That departs from Trump's published tax plan on his website, which said as of Wednesday he would "reduce taxes across-the-board," but especially for working and middle-income Americans. Independent economists' studies of Trump's plan during the campaign found that it would benefit high-income taxpayers more than others.

Mnuchin told CNBC that the upper-income gains under Trump's tax plan would be "offset by less deductions that pay for it," but provided little specificity other than to say he'd limit tax breaks in areas such as mortgage interest, one of the most expensive and politically popular tax expenditures in the federal code. He indicated that charitable giving, another expensive tax break, would remain.

"We'll still let you do charities but there'll be other deductions that will be absolutely limited," Mnuchin said. "We'll cap mortgage interest but allow some deductibility."

Trump's transition team didn't immediately respond to a request for more details on how the president-elect would offset the upper-income cuts.

Chuck Marr, the director of federal tax policy at the left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, said Mnuchin's remarks were "completely at odds with the tax plan that Trump announced during the campaign." In a blog post, he wrote: "To be sure, the plan that Trump announced would limit itemized deductions for high-income taxpayers (to $100,000 for individuals, $200,000 for joint filers). The value of the tax cuts that would disproportionately benefit the richest people, however, far outweighs the deduction limit."

During his presidential run, Trump proposed a massive tax cut that, according to an analysis by the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, would cost $6.2 trillion over 10 years and provide the largest after-tax gains to the top 0.1 percent of earners — a 14.2 percent cut. The conservative Tax Foundation also concluded that the highest earners would receive the largest benefit under Trump's plan.

The Tax Policy Center found that under Trump's plan, the highest earners would pay no more than a 33 percent rate on their income, down from the current top rate of 39.6 percent. House Republican leaders' latest policy blueprint similarly seeks to cut the top tax rate to 33 percent.

Tax cuts for high-earning individuals are politically unpopular in an era of growing wealth disparities, and Trump seldom discussed them at campaign rallies. In 2012, one of President Barack Obama's most effective talking points was that Republican Mitt Romney's plan would cut taxes for the wealthiest Americans.

During the campaign, an analysis of Trump's tax plan found that some of his proposals — repealing the "head of household" filing status and ending personal exemptions — would mean higher taxes for large families and single parents. That analysis by Lily Batchelder, a New York University law professor, was at least somewhat confirmed by Tax Foundation economist Kyle Pomerleau, who posted on Twitter that "the results seem reasonable to me."

But Mnuchin said Wednesday that the ultimate tax legislation won't harm middle-class earners.

"When we work with Congress and go through this, it will be very clear: this is a middle-income tax cut," he said.

about the writer

about the writer

Sahil Kapur

More from Business

See More
card image
Alex Kormann/The Minnesota Star Tribune

Exports to Canada from Minnesota continue to fall. The U.S. House in a rare rebuke this week voted to end the tariffs.

A logo sign outside of a facility occupied by Cargill Animal Nutrition in Little Chute, Wis., on June 24, 2018.
card image