You've probably seen these: IKEA's catalog illustration for most of the world . . .
. . . and the Saudi version.
Leaving aside the issue of removing women from the catalog entirely - which is like saying "let's discuss that deadly circus fire in terms of its impact on peanut sales" - you have to marvel at the difficulty of the Photoshopping. The wall on her left side is expertly reconstructed. The mirror must have been a nightmare; that's no simple clone-tool job.
There's not enough to work with, the lines have to match up, and there's a subtle difference in the shade from top to bottom behind her. Whatever they came up with, it doesn't look like anything really works - the position of the mirror or what it might be reflecting. The real giveaway is here:
The picture's compressed and full of artifacts, but you can get a hint of how it was reconstructed, and two identical towels - heaven knows where they came from - were dropped in. Maybe. The other possibility is that they shot the first picture in Saudi Mode, then Photoshopped her into the picture? No. IKEA 'fessed up:
Don't you love the language they use? Someone mistakenly spent six hours meticulously removing all traces of a Mom from the pictures in the catalogue. Total mistake. His hand must have slipped.
Also: the term "Photoshopping" is understood by all to mean "digital manipulation that produces a falsehood." I can't think of any other product name that has such an unflattering definition.