The NFL's conference championship Sunday turned into much-happier viewing for Vikings followers than it was a year earlier, when their heroes, riding the crest of the Minneapolis Miracle, were humbled 38-7 by the Eagles in Philadelphia.
This time, there was no such angst for the home-state favorites, having avoided the playoffs with a miserable effort vs. Bears in the regular-season finale inside The Zygi.
All the Purple crowd could hope last Sunday was coming out on the right side of grudges, and that turned out to be case for generations of Vikings fans young, middle-aged and old.
The bitterness had not subsided for any of these groups over the events of Jan. 24, 2010 in the Superdome, when the New Orleans Saints went after Vikings quarterback Brett Favre with great exuberance and wound up advancing to the Super Bowl with a 31-28 victory.
The Saints' theory seemed to be that they would keep clobbering Favre in questionable fashion, and the officials wouldn't call everything. It worked, as only two of a half-dozen hits on Favre that would have been no-doubt 15-yarders under today's roughing-the-passer ethic were called.
The high-low hit on Favre that came on an interception and went uncalled wound up being cited by the league office as the worst of the missed calls, and it's the one that still gets Vikings zealots riled up.
I found this out on Twitter on Sunday, when suggesting that what turned into "Bountygate'' really could not be classified as "cheating,'' not in my definition – not in the sense of taping another team's practice, or hacking into another team's computer system to gain information, or taking an obviously incorrect lie and claiming innocence in the Masters.
My opinion is the Saints would have gone after Favre with such vigor whether or not there was a bounty to be earned. This was about a trip to the Super Bowl, and a blustering, off-the-wall assistant convinced the defensive players that punishing Favre would help get them there.