Damage from the June storms is providing University of Minnesota researchers with a crash course in treefall.
While cities across the state are still dotted with toppled trunks and heaved-up root balls, researchers are scrambling to document patterns that might reveal why some trees fell and others didn't. That might — or might not — prove whether trees rooted in tight spaces in urban boulevards are weakened by sidewalk, street, sewer and other public works projects, and ultimately change how those projects are managed and even how urban landscapes are designed.
Gary Johnson, U professor of urban and community forestry, said that with fresh evidence of 3,000 downed trees, Minneapolis is an ideal laboratory for the $30,000 study approved Wednesday night by the city's Park and Recreation Board.
Most of the tree loss appeared to have occurred on boulevards, the grassy corridors between sidewalks and streets, with far less loss in yards, Johnson noted. That's what most foresters would expect, he said, but his study aims to document how recently there had been any major excavation and pavement work around the fallen trees.
A need for data
"We've had some data pointing to 'Yes, it is a higher frequency,' " he said, describing the apparent relationship between relatively recent street work — say, within the past five years — and tree loss in storms. "But we haven't had enough data."
Johnson said the study could lead Minneapolis and other communities to remove and replace older trees as part of street and sidewalk projects to reduce the number of storm-vulnerable trees lining city streets.
Cities might even move sidewalks next to streets, eliminating boulevards but creating more space in the public right of way so trees would be at less risk from snowplowing and other work.
Johnson said he expects to have some conclusions by October.