The Minnesota Department of Human Services (DHS) has launched an investigation into the billing practices of a court-appointed monitor who has been highly critical of the state's efforts to reform services for people with disabilities.
Auditors at DHS are investigating whether more than $1.2 million in expense invoices submitted by the federally appointed court monitor and reimbursed by the agency are excessive and may violate state policy. Human Services Commissioner Lucinda Jesson ordered the review after discovering three first-class airplane tickets of more than $1,000 each that exceed state expense guidelines, according to an April 7 letter from Jesson obtained by the Star Tribune.
The monitor, David Ferleger of Jenkintown, Pa., was appointed by U.S. District Court Judge Donovan Frank to oversee the implementation of a landmark 2011 federal court settlement that required Minnesota to revamp its services for thousands of people with disabilities and compelled the state to phase out the use of restraints and seclusion in state-licensed facilities. Ferleger also was appointed as a technical consultant to the federal court in a class-action lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Minnesota's sex offender program. Ferleger has billed the state $1.24 million for his work on both cases since 2012, according to DHS.
"In the upcoming days, our internal audits office, at my request, will review the past billing practices [in the two cases] to ensure appropriate internal controls and the proper use of taxpayer dollars," Jesson wrote. Ferleger did not respond to calls seeking comment, although in documents shared with attorneys the court monitor said his billing is "conservative" and in keeping with court guidelines.
The move to audit Ferleger's receipts is seen by some close to the litigation as an effort to discredit a monitor who repeatedly and publicly admonished the DHS for failing to move quickly enough on major reforms of state services for people with disabilities. Ferleger was appointed in part because of Frank's frustration with what he saw as the sluggish pace of DHS reform efforts.
In a scathing report last October, Ferleger found that state-regulated facilities continue to subject people with disabilities to harsh disciplinary practices, including life-threatening prone restraints and seclusion. Ferleger found that one woman at a group home in Crystal urinated on herself after being strapped to a restraint chair for up to nine hours a day without food or bathroom breaks.
In mid-April, Ferleger issued another report accusing the agency of filing inaccurate or unverifiable information with the federal court. Administrators at DHS have objected strongly to many of Ferleger's claims, and their back-and-forth letters and motions with the court have become increasingly acrimonious in recent months.
'Distraction from real issue'
"This looks to be a collateral attack on the court and a distraction from the real issue," said Shamus O'Meara, a Minneapolis attorney representing people with disabilities and families in the 2011 court settlement. "DHS should take a look at the ongoing abuse of people who are vulnerable instead of griping about the court monitor's expenses, which DHS brought upon itself."