More patients are getting tested for vitamin D deficiency, but the value of the tests remains too murky to make them routine, an influential advisory group says.
There simply isn't enough evidence that testing the blood of healthy, symptom-free people for vitamin D deficiency will end up improving people's health, says the draft recommendation from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. The task force — an independent panel whose recommendations influence which prevention measures are widely adopted — also says there's little evidence testing would hurt.
Low vitamin D levels have been linked with bone fractures, falls, cancer, diabetes, heart disease, depression and even early death, the task force says. But studies have not shown that giving vitamin D supplements to apparently healthy people with low levels can prevent those problems.
Another issue: Expert groups disagree on how low is too low. Also, different lab tests can produce different results. Because of varying standards and study methods, estimates of vitamin D deficiency in the U.S. population range from 19% to 77%, the task force says.
"There's a lot of controversy here," says task force co-chair Albert Siu, a geriatrics professor at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York.
Read more from USA Today.
Many children still breathe secondhand smoke
Alcohol poisoning kills thousands in U.S.
Four Minnesota hospitals designated for Ebola treatment
Calorie counts coming to more menus

StarTribune.com welcomes and encourages readers to comment and engage in substantive, mutually respectful exchanges over news topics. Commenters must follow our Terms of Use.
Comments will be reviewed before being published.