Thank you so much for the Aug. 2 article "Timber harvest raises an outcry."
I learned last summer that the land adjacent to mine was being auctioned for logging. (You might say it's across the road, but I own a bit across the road, too.) It hasn't been cut yet, but lots of work is being done on the dirt road I live on, and I presume this is for the loggers' benefit.
Last summer I tried to convince the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources not to cut the trees, since this is old-growth forest, too, with giant pines. One pine by my house is 90 inches around, and one by the garage is 100 inches. These are just two of many huge pines, and those on the land next to mine are also giants.
This land does not need to be managed. The good Lord has managed it perfectly. It has a pond where loons nest and beavers live, and a wild forest. But it is school trust land, and the DNR has the right to log it.
But ethically, should it be? The road it adjoins is a dead-end dirt road about 2½ miles long that many people enjoy walking. Should this glorious forest be cut to support the forest-products industry, or should it be left to give joy to the many people who live here or visit? Northern Minnesota thrives because of the many people who come here because of the lakes and trees.
I'm very disappointed that Gov. Mark Dayton is behind the push to cut more trees. He has a big push to clean up the water, but the lakes are protected by the trees, too. He needs to protect the trees and value them for the living beings they are and the joy they give to so many.
Karin Arsan, Hackensack, Minn.
• • •
We need trees for nature, wildlife and scrubbing our waste, but we also need them for building and the economy. As a big outdoorsman, someone who makes a living from nature and as woodworker, I can see the argument on both sides.