WHAT WOULD YOU GIVE UP?
Just cut spending and the question is moot
The responses to your question "what government services and benefits are you personally willing to give up to help balance the public books?" were very interesting (Opinion Exchange, Oct. 9).
I have a different perspective. We would not have to give up much if we would ask our government to look at its spending and cut unnecessary expenses.
President Obama said in his campaign speeches that he would do just that, but nothing happened.
We need to review the federal budget and eliminate pet projects that provide nothing to taxpayers. We need to cut subsidies to all corporations and farmers. We need to put America first and cut foreign aid substantially. These cuts alone would take billions of dollars off of our public books.
VEDA SIREK, NEW PRAGUE
• • •
I would be willing to let my Social Security payment remain the same and pay taxes on the full amount if corporate executives, leading public officials and high-paid workers would agree to freeze their wages and cut their bonuses in half for five years.
Savings achieved by these actions should be used to hire the unemployed. This would provide the working class with increased buying power, and hopefully the economy would begin to flourish again. All this without raising any taxes -- except the tax on my Social Security benefits.