D. Roger Pederson's Sept. 22 commentary, "Mpls., I love you and I might leave you," was well-taken by a fellow boomer who has circled the sun 72½ times (to borrow Pederson's method of measuring age). I largely agreed with the points he made. Especially I share his frustration that everyone in charge seems to be "not as wise and experienced as we are," but that is because this is the reality of our ages.
I would like to invite Peterson to consider St. Peter, Minn., as a place to live, as it is but 70 miles out; is a vibrant college town (Gustavus Adolphus); is familiar and livable (about 11,000 people); is a county seat; is 15 minutes from the large regional center of Mankato, which has a major unit of Minnesota State University; and with a lovely two-bedroom condo for sale right next door to ours, where we retired two years ago after 40 years on an 80-acre hobby farm on the Minnesota River nearby. From here you can have almost anything of the Twin Cities that is desirable.
If downsizing is the goal, 2,000 square feet or so is hardly a sacrifice, and condo community lawn and snow service is wonderful. Rural, or sub-suburban, living in a town like this is not banishment, isolation, nor sacrifice of any kind. Indeed, on a recent Friday, we attended the opening concert of the Minnesota Orchestra at Orchestra Hall, and on another recent afternoon attended a chamber music recital in Mankato by three Twin Cities musicians who themselves traveled here, to play for us. In a couple of weeks, our Guthrie Theatre-by-bus season begins.
Given the background Pederson disclosed, he would love this community and the people here. Just in this condo building of four units alone, we possess advanced degrees from Columbia, Yale and Cornell! The nationally acclaimed Nobel Conference held annually by Gustavus was recently held with two days of stimulating lectures and cerebral exercise, this year's topic being global climate change.
But, rural malaise, immigration of "others," health of the waters (especially the Minnesota River), rural poverty and drug abuse, public school integrity, access to health care, etc., etc., are nevertheless on the radar screen out here, too. I'd like Pederson as a neighbor, but change in ourselves is probably more important than change in personal location of dwelling, as my darling wife keeps reminding me.
John A. Chamberlain, St. Peter, Minn.
MINING IN MINNESOTA
Editorial Board's e-mail quest is baffling, if not absurd
The Star Tribune Editorial Board seems to have a lot of issues with the proposed Twin Metals Minnesota (TMM) mine in northern Minnesota. But its Sept. 29 editorial, "More questions about Twin Metals," was based on two irrelevant and genuinely baffling points: 1) that Minnesota Department of Natural Resources staffers aren't exchanging enough e-mail about TMM: and 2) that the dry stack tailings storage technology TMM announced in July was not recommended for the PolyMet mine. PolyMet is an altogether different kind of project in a different site with utterly different baseline facts.
While we can't speak for the DNR, the "dearth of discussion about the Twin Metals mine" is hardly surprising. TMM has yet to submit a proposed mine plan, meaning its permitting process has yet to begin. What does the board expect DNR staffers to be e-mailing about? This was a fishing expedition through DNR staff e-mails — and an abuse of open-records access. We agree with the Star Tribune that Minnesotans do deserve to know much more about this project. And they will, as a rigorous regulatory review process kicks in after the mine plan is filed. They'll also continue to weigh in, as they have already.
We do hope minds will remain open and let the process play out. TMM's project holds the promise of being a modern, environmentally sound mine that will help us build a green economy — and bring 2,100 full-time and spinoff jobs to a region that needs them.