People need to get over themselves if they think the government is endlessly fascinated with what they get up to in their private lives. How much do you think it would cost to subject hundreds of millions of Americans to "Big Brother"- style scrutiny? That snooper plane the other day was obviously looking for something specific rather than just canvassing the entire population looking for anything juicy they could find.
And enough of this slippery slope/conspiracy theory paranoia. We are not "slowly losing our freedom." I don't know what's more absurd: that there is an evil cabal within the government that is secretly ginning up a totalitarian agenda, or that we're all going to go to sleep after putting the legislative process on automatic pilot. We have separation of powers in this country, and the U.S. government is the most intensely scrutinized in the world. Constitutionally iffy policies sometimes slip through the cracks, but more egregious violations are easily beaten back.
A more accurate model than the slippery slope is the "pendulum." The more you try to push in one direction, the stronger the counterswing. But politics doesn't follow the laws of physics like pendulums do, so the counterswing — the "backlash," that is — is often more powerful than the initial movement. We're seeing lot of that lately.
Patrick McCauley, Edina
SPITTING
It's not the government's job to control this macho behavior
Spitting in public is a disgusting habit, but the Minneapolis City Council is right not to make it a function of government to oversee its prohibition. It is the responsibility of individuals and private entities to enforce personal and group control of an unnecessary habit Particularly onerous is the practice of athletes, primarily baseball players, to expectorate while on the playing field. Urination in public in overcrowded countries is less reprehensible than the "show" put on to demonstrate machismo in America, with television exposing all of us to this unsanitary practice.
Arthur E. Higinbotham, St. Paul
CAMPAIGN FINANCING
Shame on Minnesota for halting political contribution refunds
At a time when our nation is suffering the disastrous consequences of the Citizens' United decision by the U.S. Supreme Court, which struck down campaign finance reform and allowed corporations to spend unlimited amounts of money on political campaigns, and at a time when public campaign financing is desperately needed, Gov. Mark Dayton signed the omnibus budget bill, which included a suspension of the Political Contribution Refund Program.
This program refunded up to $50 per individual for contributions to a party or candidate per year. Republicans like to call public campaign financing "welfare for politicians," but the alternative is Republican and Democratic parties that are receiving huge amounts of money from wealthy donors and have allegiance to money, not the people. But there's another sinister reason behind this bipartisan measure. The two-party tyranny was shocked at how well minor parties used this money against them in the last election. The suspension period precisely targets minor parties from building a campaign war chest while doing little harm to their duopoly. The two-party tyranny believes it has an entitlement to power, and it despises a multiparty democracy that can tip the balance of power.
Shamefully, Minnesota government is quick to throw the democracy-baby out with the bath water.
Chris Wright, Bloomington
FRANKLIN GRAHAM
So Christians are boycotting gay businesses? Good luck with that
I was so disappointed by Franklin Graham calling on Christians to boycott gay-friendly corporations (Nation/World briefs, June 9). Instead of concentrating on the work he does with children in poverty around the world, or urging Christians to support and volunteer with the pressing issues of extreme poverty, disease prevention, racial inequality and homelessness, he chooses to campaign against gay-friendly companies.