GUN VIOLENCE
The roles of liberty and the Constitution
In response to the Jan. 10 letter on gun violence that ended with "Never forget, the Constitution was created to protect us citizens from our government": This libertarian myth is contrary to the full breadth of the document. According to constitutional scholar Garrett Epps (writing in the Nation, Feb. 7, 2011): "[The] document as a whole is much more concerned about what the government can do -- not with what it can't. From the beginning, it was empowered to levy taxes, to raise armies, to make war, to set the rules of commerce and to bind the nation through treaties and international agreements. ... [It] was not written to weaken an overreaching Congress but to strengthen an enfeebled one."
The Constitution continues to be a living, breathing document -- the 27 Amendments are proof of this -- and should not be considered a means to restrict our present laws based on an 18th-century, musket-toting populace.
LUANNE SPEETER, EDINA
• • •
The reason that gun owners are against central registration ("Register weapons as we do vehicles," Readers Write, Jan. 8) has a lot to do with lessons learned from the history of other nations. It seemed logical to register guns in Great Britain, then people had to turn them in to be scrapped or face prosecution. It seemed logical to register guns in Australia, then people had to turn them in to be scrapped or face prosecution.
Nazi Germany decided to register both guns AND people in order to keep track of them. It must have seemed logical at the time as well. History has shown us that registration can be misleading as to the real intention or final execution of a long-term plan.
The parallel with vehicle registration is not quite valid, since there is not a large-enough group of Americans who embrace a nation devoid of automobiles, at least not yet.
BRENT HALL, CHANHASSEN