While viewing the James Comey interview on Sunday evening ("Comey heaps fuel on feud with Trump," April 16), I felt I was watching a man conflicted by his actions in both his handling of the Hillary Clinton e-mail probe and his interactions with the current president. Many have and will continue to associate negative adjectives with Comey — adjectives such as self-righteous, ego-driven, self-promoting, angry. I may even agree with such adjectives. However, ascribing the word "liar" to this man, in my opinion, does not apply. I felt he was simply telling the truth, and, as the adage goes, the truth sometimes hurts. Loved ones in my life have told me truths I did not want to hear. But, as one in many millions who value honesty, I was always grateful. Many are angry with James Comey for one reason or another. I'm sure his interview did nothing to quell that anger. I just do not believe that dishonesty in Comey can be chosen as a justification for that anger. He simply came off [Sunday] night as stating the truth and I appreciate that, even if the truth sometimes hurts.
Diane Aegler, Burnsville
• • •
Wishing Comey would have steered clear of peripheral mudslinging. Should have remembered the adage about wrestling with a pig: You both get dirty, and the pig likes it.
Not heeding Michelle Obama's words about going high when they go low runs the inevitable risk of being painted with the same smelly brush.
Michael Cassel, Roseville
• • •
In his interview with ABC's George Stephanopoulos, former FBI Director Comey said Trump is morally unfit to be president. With unmitigated clarity, Comey said, "A person who sees moral equivalence in Charlottesville, who talks about and treats women like they're pieces of meat, who lies constantly about matters big and small and insists the American people believe it — that person's not fit to be president of the United States, on moral grounds."
This is not a political statement; it's a call to those in power, and to all of us, to look dispassionately at the situation and decide whether we agree. If we do, moral backbone insists that whatever political policies we think we're gaining from this presidency are ill-gotten goods; that legitimate politics provide avenues for conscience, not raw power; that we are called to address this unique situation with good-faith efforts to place in office a president who travels the high road, who will reflect the principles we founded our country upon.
Our president is a servant of the people, not an authority figure who cannot be repudiated.