JUDGING JUDGES
A vote for a nonpartisan citizen commission
I couldn't agree more with the need to pass a constitutional amendment to reform the way judges are evaluated and retained ("It's a judgment call," March 7).
The need for a nonpartisan citizen commission to evaluate judges and for the retention elections that would follow is more critical than ever. With the recent Supreme Court decision that gives corporate entities the power to contribute directly to elections, judicial campaigns are more susceptible than ever to powerful corporate interests that have nothing to do with justice and everything to do with corrupting our democracy.
Corporations can flood the rhetoric of any campaign with enough money to control it. Some corporations have enough money to remove judges at will, and the fallout from such elections will affect a judge throughout an entire career. If we are interested in blind justice, based on impartial juries and fair judges, this amendment is a necessity.
WILLIAM PAPPAS, STILLWATER
airport signs
Airlines can provide still more clarification
I had the misfortune this morning of having to drive my wife to the airport at 4 a.m. Along the way we got to admire the new sign informing us that the Lindbergh terminal is the same as Terminal 1.
And then there was the new sign informing us that the Humphrey terminal is the same as Terminal 2. While we were wondering why it takes two signs to convey this information, it occurred to us that nowhere on my wife's tickets or itinerary did it actually say which terminal to go to. All it said was "MSP."
Maybe the airlines could print that tidbit on their tickets and save us all the millions of dollars it will take to erect the fancy new signs.
And while we're at it, Metropolitan Airports Commission, how about some signs on the approach to Terminal 1? Currently we have "Ticketing/Drop Off" and "Baggage Claim" traffic lanes. My wife objects to being claimed as "baggage." How about a sign that says "Pick Up"?