EYEING SCHOOL RESERVES
A cash-strapped state may come calling
I find it interesting that the state can require school districts to "lend" it money (front page, Jan. 14). It was not too long ago that each district controlled its own funds. In a time of plenty, a politician (Gov. Jesse Ventura) took over all funding of schools, and everyone cheered because it took schools off their property taxes. People thought it saved them money!
Very shortly, the state will need cash on hand to be writing tax refunds. How about this for a solution: Lay off employees from the Department of Revenue and tell Minnesota taxpayers that no refunds will be given this year due to budget shortfalls; we are already doing without that money anyway. Oops! Individuals who get affected can vote; entities, like a school district, cannot.
ROBERT GJERTSON, FRIDLEY
METRO HOSPITALS
More income, and they cut staff and caregivers?
While Twin Cities hospitals are practically dislocating a shoulder patting themselves on the back for pulling in $327 million in net income during the first three quarters of 2009, there is a darker side to the otherwise rosy outlook presented in the Jan. 12 story "Twin Cities hospitals staunching flow of red ink."
Despite admitting nearly 300,000 patients during the first three quarters of 2009 (a 20,000 patient increase compared to the previous year), metro hospitals slashed nearly 1,750 jobs.
So while these "not for profit" hospitals raked in close to $330 million in profits and saw a huge bump in the amount of patients coming through their doors, they decided the best way to respond was by cutting staff.
Readers, what if your newborn son suddenly began having trouble breathing in his hospital room, and when your bedridden wife rang the call light for a nurse, nobody came?
It's a proven fact that safe staffing levels save lives and provide the best possible care. So why are Twin Cities hospitals cutting staff despite amassing huge profits? Why not hire back those caregivers and other staff who lost their jobs in the past year?