HEALTH CARE REFORM
Why not first try out
a pilot with Medicare?
Before enacting and implementing an extensive health care reform, why not apply many worthwhile evaluative findings in a pilot project as a part of our existing and soon-to-be insolvent Medicare program? It happens to be a publicly funded health program that includes private providers and insurance companies.
The pilot project would include cost-saving and quality-improvement findings without involving a tax increase or adding to the federal deficit. Examples include: rewarding cost-effective outcomes and penalizing unnecessary procedures; establishing an independent advisory panel to set research-based standards of care; using physician assistants and nurse practitioners for less serious issues; reducing drug pricing by competitive bids; reducing overpayments for the Medicare Advantage option; increasing education for prevention and for end-of-life decisions; setting caps for malpractice lawsuits, and continuing private supplemental insurance for people desiring more coverage.
SHELDON OLKON, GOLDEN VALLEY
•••
Regional Medicare payment disparities (front page, July 30) have long been a complaint. The obscure formula set when Medicare was enacted 40 years ago did its best to reflect cost-of-living disparities in America. A BLT sandwich will cost more in New York City than in Ames, Iowa. Quality has nothing to do with it.
What is needed is a new formula that will reflect overall cost of living in a census tract and not simply the current medical charges. Quality of care will need to be assessed locally as patients normally cannot travel to "the best" sites but must be served by local providers. Surely we do not need additional bureaucracy.
MARY K. LUND, MINNETONKA
•••