A recent commentary writer bases his case for depriving felons of the basic right to vote on the story of a brutal murder committed 21 years ago by a white supremacist ("Should prisoners have the right to vote?" May 10). It is a compelling argument when you hand-pick your felon, but the larger issue is restoring full citizenship to men and women who have served their sentences.
Life after prison is hard. The norms of prison life — how to stay safe and be respected — are wildly different from the norms of life on the outside. Most, if not all, released felons struggle to find work and a place to live; many are challenged with various forms of mental illness. Incarceration is punishment enough.
We should be making it easier for released felons to succeed, not harder.
The Bard Prison Initiative focuses on human potential for growth and change through education. It is that enormous potential of both incarcerated and released felons that gets lost when we fail to acknowledge them as full citizens and as voting members of our community.
We should create a release ceremony similar to the ceremony new U.S. citizens receive before a judge. Felons would review similar questions detailing the requirements and responsibilities of full citizenship, pass the same test and, upon release, appear before a judge to pledge their allegiance to the United States of America and its laws and thus regain all the rights and duties of citizenship, including the right to vote. A felon's release should be ceremonial and celebratory, a recognition of their re-entry into the free world.
Expecting released felons to do well would be more effective than treating them like permanent criminals. The recidivism rate in the U.S. is already extremely high. Treating men and women as fully human won't make it worse. Let's give freedom a chance.
Kathleen Coskran, Minneapolis
MIGRANT SHELTERS
Don't let distance from the border sow complacency over the issue
12,500 young people are currently held in migrant youth shelters overseen by the Office of Refugee Resettlement. This figure includes both children arriving as unaccompanied minors and children separated from their parents at the U.S.-Mexico border under the family-separation policy. The shelters operate privately, funded by Department of Health and Human Services dollars.
Despite government funding, shelters often lack sufficient education, recreation, legal and health services. Some have failed to use background checks to screen staff. Worst of all, children have endured physical and sexual abuse by staff at some shelters.